Eszter's Blog         // via eszter.com //
esztersblog.com

« Eszter.com »              « E-LIST »              « Research »              « Gallery »

Welcome to Eszter's Weblog Here you will find my thoughts and comments about all sorts of things from sociology, the Internet, academia, teaching, research, books and movies to current events, fun Web stuff, art, gadgets and just about anything else that comes to mind. If the inspiration strikes you during your visit, feel free to leave a note via the comments link.

[Previous entry: "Paddling for bandwidth"] [Main Index] [Next entry: "A different kind of road trip"]

"Allowing comments on blogs"
07/08/2004 Entry

The recent discussion of blogs and their democratic characteristics (or lack thereof) prompted by Laura’s comments at Apt 11D in response to critiques of her blog study’s survey instrument has gotten me thinking about the comments option on blogs yet again. It is a question I have pondered numerous times already, probably ever since I started reading blogs and certainly since I decided to start my own.

For me, the question of whether a site that calls itself a blog has comments option turned on is actually quite directly related to what constitutes a blog in the first place. I realize this is a question that is probably impossible to answer in a way that would satisfy everybody, but it is one still worth asking especially if one is to do research on the topic (as I am doing now) where a definition would be helpful.

One of Laura’s concerns is that the blogosphere is not very democratic. That’s true (she mentions some reasons and others have discussed this point at length elsewhere as well). However, blogs can have a democratic component: Comments. Why is it that certain bloggers decide to go without comments? And what makes their Web site a blog in that case? (Clearly I am showing my bias here in that I believe comments are an essential part of a blog. That said, I do realize and accept blogs as blogs even when they do not have comments turned on.. but do so mostly because the community has decided to consider them blogs. You know which ones I mean.)


Laura herself does not have comments on her Web site. This makes her blog more undemocratic than many other blogs. The only way someone can comment on an entry posted on a non-commentable blog is by posting an entry on their own blog. This already excludes those numerous readers who do not have blogs of their own, but more importantly, it also leaves the original post untouched by critical response. And that makes blogs less interesting in my view. And certainly less democratic.

Of course, I understand some of the reasons why people may not allow for comments. It can be an extra burden on the blogger. If one doesn’t want certain types of material present on a site then one must constantly monitor comments. This can become tedious in the case of blogs that attract a lot of attention and response. But comments can add a very interesting and important component to blogs. Crooked Timber would be quite different without the insightful and witty (although in some cases very frustrating) contributions of our readers. I wouldn’t have it any other way (here I only speak for myself and not the entire CT crew, but I suspect many would agree). A reader can always decide to skip reading the comments (which, of course, underscores the fact that commentators do not have the same level of input as the posters), but those who are most engaged with and interested in a post likely do read the responses from other readers. (Perhaps that idea needs to be tested, but I think it’s a reasonable assumption.)

I certainly do not mean to glorify comments too much. There are excellent and very valuable blogs that do have comments turned on yet receive little response. That does not mean that they are not being read nor that people do not have reactions to what is said on the blog. It seems to take several thousand readers to produce a few dozen comments so only a few blogs will receive lots of comments. Nonetheless, the issue here is the option to comment.

So bloggers, why no comments? And readers, do you care? (I realize it’s a bit problematic to ask that question here, but this is just for discussion, it’s obviously not a scientific poll of any sort.)


Replies: 5 Comments have been posted, click here to see them and add your own

Hello!

Thank you for your efforts. I think we share similar ideas. As an educator myself (university professor of biology) I gain a lot from reading and sharing thoughts with others in the same “fold”.

PipeTobacco
http://frumpyprofessor.blogspot.com

Posted by PipeTobacco @ 07/12/2004 01:17 PM CST

Hello!

Thank you for your efforts. I think we share similar ideas. As an educator myself (university professor of biology) I gain a lot from reading and sharing thoughts with others in the same “fold”.

PipeTobacco
http://frumpyprofessor.blogspot.com

Posted by PipeTobacco @ 07/12/2004 01:23 PM CST

I hadn't thought about adding comments because I know most of my readers are friends or family who will comment to me later. I tried it yesterday, only to find that blogger puts the comments on the main page in such a fashion that it looks awful and makes it very difficult to distinguish between what I post and the comments. I took the ability to comment away as soon as I saw that. However, the purpose of my page is entertainment (I'm not sure if I am entertaining myself or my readers), rather than discussion, so whether or not I receive critical response doesn't matter as much to me as it might to a political/thought provoking blog (such as Crooked Timber).

Posted by Laura @ 07/15/2004 03:33 PM CST

nice article. Thanks from online casino

Posted by online casino @ 08/20/2004 09:07 AM CST

online poker

Posted by online poker @ 08/20/2004 09:08 AM CST

Powered By Greymatter


July 2004
SMTWTFS
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031


Links of Interest

How to win the Nobel Prize
Click for Mammogram
Play "Match That Blogger"
Blogathon 03 Archives


Recent entries

» Extending Internet access to low-income communities
» Shattered
» The story behind red alert
» Weekend trivia
» Would you cut up a book?
» Pizza, cholesterol check, the works
» Welcome
» A different kind of road trip
» Allowing comments on blogs
» Paddling for bandwidth
» The right to a soda.. at any price
» Online communities
» Silly.. but we all do it
» Paris notes
» New book on Social Inequality


Previous entries

May, 2002 - July, 2003


Blogger info

Eszter Hargittai
Communication Studies Department
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois 60208
blog at eszter dot com




Blogs I Visit





The small print

A few words on what I will and will not post on this blog (taken from my E-LIST entry of January 2, 2002). I have nothing against posting commercial sites as long as they come highly recommended. In fact, I'm quite interested in improving informed consumer choice so I'm very curious to hear about good experiences with online retailers. What I will refrain from posting are sites that require plug-ins or programs that are painful to deal with. Example: I will not post anything that only works with RealOne/RealPlayer as that program is intrusive and annoying beyond belief and I am not willing to reinstall it on my machine (it was hard enough to get rid of it completely in the first place) nor do I want to encourage others to have it. If your site has audio content, please make it available in multiple formats or choose one that can be run on multiple players (e.g. .avi).


Feel free to link
to my Weblog

with or without
this graphic button.


http://www.esztersblog.com


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.